An AR-15 is *NOT* a military weapon, and never has been.
You obviously don't know your weapons history. Even I, a
Swede, know that the AR-15 was used in Vietnam by the thousands.
You're wrong. Those rifles were AR-15 *style* rifles. Not
AR-15's. When the military adopted that *style* of rifle, it was designated the M-16.
The NRA is incorrect. The AR-15 was designed, and used, as
a military weapon. Bj”rn cited Wikipedia for a very incomplete
and shortened history of the AR-15. The AR-15 used in the
military was *not* an AR-15 style rifle, as the NRA would like
folks to believe.
Here is the complete history of the AK-15, which soundly refutes
the made-up story concocted by the NRA about the weapon.
https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-complete-history-of-
the-ar-15-rifle
(from Wikipedia)
In January 1963, Secretary McNamara received reports that M14
production was insufficient to meet the needs of the armed forces
and ordered a halt to M14 production. At the time, the AR-15 was
the only rifle that could fulfill a requirement of a "universal"
infantry weapon for issue to all services. McNamara ordered its
adoption.
That's misleading. Try reading more here:
That is *not* misleading, although it is incomplete due to shortened
length.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15_style_rifle#Comparison_to_military_versions
I don't know how I can make it any more simple, so that you can
understand it. An AR-15 rifle is a *civilian* firearm and is not
used by *ANY* military.
There are many AR-15 style rifles. None of them being the AR-15
that was designed, tested, and used by the US military.
The NRA does not want anybody to know that. Now they're busted.
--Lee
--
Your Hole Is Our Goal
--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin:
news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)