Can FMAIL support more than one net with the same zone?
Right now, I've got a mishmash of gecho and fastecho. Gecho isn't succeeding in sending stuff out, but has stuff coming in. Fastecho is working both ways, but doesn't support League 10 and Araknet both
being in zone 10.
Hi Martin,
On 2024-04-12 14:58:00, you wrote to All:
Can FMAIL support more than one net with the same zone?
The short answer is no, it doesn't support 5D addressing.
But depending on your role in the two nets: Are you just a downlink, or
are you a Hub/*C. And do the nets have overlapping net numbers? You can probably set something up that works, where the two nets are in different groups, and if you are a Hub/*C, cook up a routing table for netmail
routing to go right.
Right now, I've got a mishmash of gecho and fastecho. Gecho isn't succeeding in sending stuff out, but has stuff coming in. Fastechois
working both ways, but doesn't support League 10 and Araknet both
being in zone 10.
Maybe it should be fixed at the source and don't have two nets with the
same zone number? ;-) Maybe one can be changed or abolished?
Maybe it should be fixed at the source and don't have two nets with
the same zone number? ;-) Maybe one can be changed or abolished?
Nope. League 10 has been around since 2000, I think and Araknet has
only been around since 2020, but is really well established.
Can FMAIL support more than one net with the same zone? Right now, I've got a mishmash of gecho and fastecho. Gecho isn't succeeding in sending stuff out, but has stuff coming in. Fastecho is working both ways, but doesn't support League 10 and Araknet both being in zone 10.
I would also recommend to use different session and packet passwords
for each network.
I would also recommend to use different session and packet
passwords for each network.
That's always true! ;-)
You should always use diffent session, packet, etc passwords for all
your links.
I would also recommend to use different session and packet
passwords for each network.
That's always true! ;-)
You should always use diffent session, packet, etc passwords for all
your links.
That would be best. Or just wait for a bit. These networks tend to
break down quickly all by themself... ;-)
I don't intend to change FMail for this "issue". But we can support
the op, with his setup. Within the limits of what is possible of
course...
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 15:42:54 |
Calls: | 599 |
Files: | 7,638 |
Messages: | 291,683 |