What has to be done to get web interface to see new sub boards?
Tried recycling g web server but didn't fix it
What has to be done to get web interface to see new sub boards?
Tried recycling g web server but didn't fix it
Well, I must have not added them correctly LOL. I've tried recycle web server, recycle terminal server, recycle all servers via umonitor.
I'll stop and start sbbs next. I assume that will fix the issue but was trying to avoid it. Not a big deal.
Re: Cannot see all message boards in webv4forumsA recycle all services from umonitor fixed it. I was logged in as sysop through web interface, so not sure why it could not see messages. I could see them via telnet sessions, just not web sessions.
By: Amessyroom to All on Sat Jul 27 2024 18:16:13
I don't think a web server recycle is necessary.
Are you logged into the web UI as a user with sufficient permission to see the group and each board? If you're not logged in, does your web guest user have sufficient permission?
Are the boards empty? I think they'll still show up in this case, but I can't remember for sure. I did debate it.
echicken
Re: Cannot see all message boards in webv4forums By: Amessyroom to kk4qbn on Sun Jul 28 2024 10:32 amNo. I didn't know that ARS could be used to restrict access to HTTP as you indicated.
Well, I must have not added them correctly LOL. I've tried recycle web
server, recycle terminal server, recycle all servers via umonitor. I'll
stop and start sbbs next. I assume that will fix the issue but was trying
to avoid it. Not a big deal.
Did you specify any ARS such that the message bases shouldn't appear via the web? For instance, an ARS specification like "PROT NOT HTTP" would mean they wouldn't show up on the web site.
Nightfox
I tried logging out an back in to web interface also, as well as refreshing web pages at different times.
Ah. This is probably the issue. I probably did have a web connection. I'll be sure to have all sessions clear; when I add message bases.
it. But all 200+ usenet groups are n
seen in http and terminal server
it. But all 200+ usenet groups are n
seen in http and terminal server
Some people BBS to escape and keep
their stuff off the web :).. then we go
and put the BBS content on the web!
Just a little funny.
It is unfortunate, that some people will not try telnet. So, I see the web interface as a way to get "new" users to try, and then get them to use
It is unfortunate, that some people will not try telnet. So, I see the web
interface as a way to get "new" users to try, and then get them to use
Someone might've already beat me to responding to this, but what about fTelnet? I enabled the web interface on my BBS, but I think I disabled most of the things it does. When you land on the BBS's webpage, it has an fTelnet terminal ready for you to connect in right there from your browser.
No. I have that enabled, I've even sent urls that provide ftelnet to
friends , and shared on facebook. And it seems to draw very few people.
I've not tried to advertise per say on echoes, yet. as most things are still stock on my bbs. But I'm learning and trying to customize a few things, before I use those methods to draw people to the board.
phigan wrote to Amessyroom <=-
Some people BBS to escape and keep
their stuff off the web :).. then we go
and put the BBS content on the web!
Just a little funny.
No. I have that enabled, I've even sent urls that provide ftelnet to friends , and shared on facebook. And it seems to draw very few people.
Web crawlers have indexed so many default Synchronet installs that the
horse is long out of the barn on this one...
No. I have that enabled, I've even sent urls that provide ftelnet to friends , and shared on facebook. And it seems to draw very few people.
It doesn't hurt to try, but your chances of converting a friend / acquaintance / colleague are slim to none.
Think about what your BBS offers to someone who already has the entire internet at their disposal. Maybe you've got something special, but probably not.
Think about how your BBS looks to someone accustomed to modern technology. Maybe they have an interest in retrocomputing or will find a more bare bones UI appealing, but probably not. Maybe you've got unique content they'll look past the UI to get at, but probably not.
Think about how your BBS looks to someone accustomed to modern technology.
Maybe they have an interest in retrocomputing or will find a more bare
bones UI appealing, but probably not. Maybe you've got unique content
they'll look past the UI to get at, but probably not.
God, now I need a drink.
I know this might come across as a bit discouraging, and that's not my intention.
My own BBS is a sandbox for me to play in and develop stupid things for. Other people are welcome to come along and use it, but I don't advertise apart from maybe being on a list or two. There are better places to go if you want active games, local message areas, I don't know what else. I have no interest in competing nor energy to do so.
echicken
| Sysop: | altere |
|---|---|
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Users: | 66 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 01:00:55 |
| Calls: | 643 |
| Files: | 7,638 |
| Messages: | 293,313 |